FHA and Investor Specialist

head_left_image

FHA reforms? Commentary on a recent article.

    

     An article in CNNMoney by Jeanne Sahadi written Here makes several points about the changes in the mortgage industry, with most of the changes being a back to basics approach for mortgage lending with fewer piggyback seconds and an increased emphasis on FHA Lending.  The article also points out three major changes lawmakers are looking to make regarding FHA Loans.  They are raising the loan limits, reducing the down payment requirements, and reducing the complexity of an FHA loan.

     I agree that FHA loan limits should be increased, at least to the current conforming loan limit of $417,000 and maybe even $625,000 for high cost areas.  However, I disagree with the elimination of the 3% down payment requirement and the reduction of FHA's "complexity".  Many homebuyers do struggle to save the required 3% for a down payment, but that is why FHA works in my opinion:  3% is enough money invested in a transaction for some people to ensure that they make every effort to keep their home.  As far as FHA's supposed complexity, the Federal Housing Authority has already reduced the appraisal requirements for FHA appraisals, and any additional disclosures the borrower has to sign are designed to protect and help them.  If more FHA loans were written rather than 80/20 loans in the last 5 years, we would not be in the precarious position we are now.

Michael Byrne, Mortgage Banker  www.mortgageprosforum.com

 

Michael Byrne

Mortgage Specialist

Contact Me

NJ Mortgage Banker        USDA Loans      Jumbo Loans      FHA Loans     VA Loans     my site

Zillow Blog          My Blog          stated income loans               Loan Officers: Do More Loans

Foreign National Mortgage Financing     Rehab Loans        Conforming Jumbo Loans

Co-Op Financing   Union Plus Mortgage    Super Jumbo Loans     Harp Loans

 

 "A referral is the greatest compliment I can receive"

 

5 commentsMichael Byrne • October 16 2007 01:33PM

Comments

I tend to disagree with the article.  There will always be the loans that fall outside the box for whatever reason and you'll always find an investor that can identify an investment that meets their Internal rate of Return, (IRR) and be willing to make a loan.

I've got a borrower who has 740 Fico, willing to accept a 80% LTV, no derogs past 24 months, loan amount $250.000, and with $50k in verifiable cash and willing to pay the equivalent of prime plus 4 for a secured 1st TD.  Would you make the loan?

There are some great loans that can be made, as you only need to tighten the guideline to eliminate the garbage credit, borrowers with no character, and include borrowers with the propensity and ability to pay the monthly obligation and willing to accept a higher lending rate.

They will probably have the name changed again.  You got to remember a subprime loan is was initially called junk loans.  Now that they have been exploited as Subprime the name will need to change to clean up the image.

The real problem was these loans were based on a model that included continually spiraling real estate prices.  Once the market adjusts, corrects or start a down turn, the premise these loans were based on becomes faulty then fear, panic and home defaults enters the market.

Posted by Find a Notary Public | needAnotary (QEC Internet Services) over 2 years ago

Ntsike, thanks for the input. 

 I think the point is that FHA is a prime loan, and that subprime lending started to try to take on "prime" characteristics, such as high LTV's etc.

Posted by Michael Byrne (Chase Home Loans) over 2 years ago
Anyone else with an opinion on pending FHA reforms?
Posted by Michael Byrne (Chase Home Loans) over 2 years ago
I personally have no problem with the 100%. I bought my first home with Nehemiah DPA, so I really came out of pocket $0.00 to get into my home. Because of the fact that FHA is a fixed rate program that does not allow an IO option, in my opinion it is one of the safest loan programs out there for the first time buyer that has a hard time saving for a down payment. I would like to see some buyer education. I definitely think that the "complexity" issue is a joke. Home ownership is not for people that need everything simplified for them. 
Posted by Terry Day (Mountain View Mortgage) over 2 years ago
Terry-thanks for the input.  I think a counseling session with a 3rd party would make sense.
Posted by Michael Byrne (Chase Home Loans) over 2 years ago

Participate



(optional)
What does the graphic say?